Mr. Roberts' email address: droberts@bostonpublicschools.org

Email me questions, concerns, or things you'd like printed!

Syllabus

AP Lang Syllabus 2024-2025.docx

Grading Policy

0/10 = Cheated, plagiarized, copied, or created by AI (ChatGPT)

5/10 = Did not complete the assignment

6/10 = Started the assignment (25%-50% done)

7/10 = Almost completed assignment (50%-80% done)

8/10 = Assignment is completed and fulfills all the requirements

9/10 = Strong response to the assignment with clear attention to detail

10/10 = Outstanding response, goes above and beyond, connects ideas to the real world and/or makes a compelling argument

Common Mistakes #1: 3 Quick Tips




Topic sentence and main claim sentence stem

Mini Grammar Lesson: Appositives

Appositives
An appositive is a noun or noun phrase that renames, explains, or identifies another noun right beside it in a sentence. The appositive adds additional information about the noun without needing a whole new sentence.


Without an appositive: My brother is coming over later. He is an engineer.


With an appositive: My brother, an engineer, is coming over later.



By using the appositive, you combine both pieces of information into a single, more elegant sentence.


More Examples

Common Mistakes #2: Identifying vs. Analyzing Rhetoric

Student 1: Just points the appeals out, simply identifying them

The speaker establishes ethos by mentioning their years of experience in the field.

The speaker appeals to the audience’s emotions by sharing a personal story of struggle.

The speaker uses facts and statistics to support their argument.


Student 2: Not only identifies, adds specifics, then digs deeper and analyzes the appeals

The speaker establishes credibility by referring to their 20 years of experience in the medical field, building trust with the audience. This is effective because it positions the speaker as an expert, which increases the audience's willingness to accept their argument. The speaker's consistent use of medical jargon also reinforces their authority, making the audience feel that they are in knowledgeable hands.

The speaker appeals to emotion by telling the heartfelt story of a young child who was denied critical treatment due to insurance loopholes. This personal anecdote tugs at the audience’s compassion, encouraging them to feel a sense of injustice and urgency. By focusing on an innocent child, the speaker evokes sympathy, making the issue feel more relatable and compelling, which strengthens their call to action.

The speaker employs logic through the use of statistics, citing that "75% of Americans support healthcare reform." This statistical evidence appeals to the audience's reason by showing that the argument is backed by factual data, reinforcing the speaker’s position as well-grounded and aligned with the majority's perspective. Furthermore, the speaker's use of logical sequencing—beginning with the problem, presenting data, and offering a solution—helps the audience follow the argument systematically, increasing its persuasiveness.


Key Difference:


Reminder: We should always speak to how and why the author is using these persuasive strategies. Are they effective, somewhat effective, or ineffective and why? What is their reasoning for using this form of persuasion?

List of Abstract Ideas to Argue

Abstract idea list.docx